Web[5] In Evins v Shield Insurance Co Ltd. 3. this Court illustrated the distinction between a dependant's claim, and a damages action for bodily injuries as follows: ‘In the case of an … Weband another v Johannesburg Consolidated Investment Co Ltd 1995 (1) SA 215 at 216H-J: Headnote ... Also, in Evins v Shield Insurance Co Ltd 1980 (2) 814 A at 825G it was succinctly and effectively defined as: “the factual basis/set of material facts that begets the plaintiff’s legal right to action. The material facts which the plaintiff
THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL OF SOUTH AFRICA …
WebWith due regard to the cause of action, it must allege the entire set of facts which give rise to an enforceable claim – Evins v Shield Insurance Co. Ltd 1980 (2) S A 814 (A) An exception may be taken if a declaration does not meet the above bench marks in that it fails to disclose the cause of action or is vague and embarrassing. WebEVINS v SHIELD INSURANCE CO LTD 1980 (2) SA 814 (A) 1980 (2) SA p814 Citation 1980 (2) SA 814 (A) Court Appellate Division Judge Jansen JA, Trollip JA, Corbett JA, … peak locations
Southern African Legal Information Institute
WebIn considering these decisions, it is appropriate to begin with Evins v Shield Insurance Co Ltd (1979 3 SA 1136 (W) (Evins)) because it had a seminal influence on the jurisprudence which followed. In Evins there was no claim based on the rei vindicatio, but the Court had to consider the meaning of the word 'debt' in the Act. In doing ... Weband another v Johannesburg Consolidated Investment Co Ltd 1995 (1) SA 215 at 216H-J: Headnote ... Also, in Evins v Shield Insurance Co Ltd 1980 (2) 814 A at 825G it was … WebStudy with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like Dhlamini v Protea Assurance Co Ltd, Santam Insurance Co v Ferguson, Lebona v President Insurance Company and more. ... only 1 cause of action. contra Evins. Evins v Shield Insurance peak lodge high peak