WebHoneycutt concerned 21 U.S.C. § 853, which mandates forfeiture of “‘any property constituting, or derived from, any proceeds the person obtained, directly or indirectly, as … WebThe U.S. Supreme Court's recent Honeycutt ruling gives defendants a powerful tool to fight joint forfeiture and they're using it, leaving prosecutors to argue against its application in individual ...
Honeycutt v. United States: SCOTUS Rejects Joint and Several Forfeiture ...
WebThis is a brief in opposition to a motion for the appointment of counsel in a civil forfeiture case pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 983 (b) (2). The statute authorizes the appointment of counsel at government expense when the property subject to forfeiture is being used as the primary residence of the claimant. The brief takes the view that the claimant ... Web22 mrt. 2024 · The argument next Wednesday in Honeycutt v. United States presents a seemingly simple statutory question. The federal forfeiture statute for narcotics conspiracies requires that a convicted defendant be ordered to forfeit the “proceeds the person obtained” from the crime. May a federal court using t is the house officially republican
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS …
Web7 jun. 2024 · Honeycutt v. United States The defendant in Honeycutt was a salaried clerk working at a hardware store owned by his brother. The store sold more than 15,000 bottles of a water-purifying product, which is also used to manufacture methamphetamine, obtaining roughly $270,000 in profits. Web8 jun. 2024 · The criminal forfeiture statute at issue in Honeycutt requires the court to order a defendant, as part of sentencing, to forfeit to the government “any property constituting, or derived from,... Web7 jun. 2024 · Honeycutt v. United States The defendant in Honeycutt was a salaried clerk working at a hardware store owned by his brother. The store sold more than 15,000 … i have 0 subscribers